The panel.
Six named referees. Same people on every roast. Each has one axis they obsess over — tap through to see how they score, what makes them say go, and what they'll kill your pitch for.
Can this actually be built, by this team, on this timeline, with this money?
Who buys this, how does the founder reach them, and why would they switch from what they do now?
Is the problem framed right? When reframed from a different angle, does the idea still hold — or collapse?
What kills this? Where does it become a graveyard story? I've watched three of these before.
Do the product's technical and engineering claims hold up? Would a competent senior engineer clone this in a weekend?
Weigh the panel's independent scores; issue the final verdict — GO, NO-GO, or GO-WITH-REFRAME.